Editorial workflow

Give every publication
a review history.

For teams turning medical source material into structured content: keep the source, the review decision and the published version connected.

01 / WORKFLOW

Record the source

Start with source material and an origin record. Define what is in scope and confirm the rights needed for your use.

02 / WORKFLOW

Make the decision visible

Separate work in progress from the result a responsible reviewer is willing to publish. Track required changes before the next step.

03 / WORKFLOW

Publish a defined version

Give downstream consumers an identifiable output. Discuss correction and republication requirements during evaluation.

Make the model tangible.

Inspect a fictional record from source through review and publication. Download a small JSON fixture and test it locally.

Explore the sample ↗

Confirm your requirements.

Evaluation scope, supported interfaces, source rights and service commitments depend on your proposed use. Discuss them before sending any real data.

Read evaluation boundaries ↗

Start with your workflow

See where governed
publication fits.

Discuss an evaluation ↗